Conclusion
A comparison of the water profiles for both cases below provided information to draw conclusions from. The water profile appears to have the most variation at the upstream and midstream of the Door Creek. The change in water profile may be a result of the detention area that was removed sometime after 1904. Finally, the water profile shows that the changing in morphology had little influence on the downstream flooding condition, which may be the result of the the overall shape not differing too drastically.